decoded.report LIVE FROM SEC FILINGS
THE BAG CHECK

Your tickers, ranked by how much trouble they're in.

Paste every microcap you hold. Each one gets the full treatment: red flags, share printing, cash countdown, insider trades. Worst offender on top.

UP TO 8 TICKERS, COMMA-SEPARATED. EACH FULL REPORT IS ONE CLICK AWAY. ·

Σ

The Lineup

3 CASE FILES
100SEVERE
NMTC NEUROONE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES Corp AVOID

92 red-flag mentions across this year's filings, led by dilution and reverse stock split, and 268 since 2001, so this is a long-running pattern; share count shrank 82% over the past year (shrinking, not printing); only about 3 months of cash at the current burn rate.

SHARES 12M: -81.7% CASH: ~3 MO TOP DRIVER: DILUTION, REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
OPEN CASE FILE →
100SEVERE
ONFOP Onfolio Holdings, Inc AVOID

60 red-flag mentions across this year's filings, led by dilution and reverse stock split; share count shrank 52% over the past year (shrinking, not printing); only about 2 months of cash at the current burn rate.

SHARES 12M: -52.2% CASH: ~2 MO TOP DRIVER: DELISTING / EXCHANGE RISK, REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
OPEN CASE FILE →
47ELEVATED
NWAX-WT New America Acquisition I Corp. AVOID

14 red-flag mentions across this year's filings, led by going concern doubt.

TOP DRIVER: GOING CONCERN DOUBT
OPEN CASE FILE →

Whose bag is worse?

Paste a friend's tickers and settle it: two lineups, head to head, ranked by the same risk index. Loser buys coffee.

One Telegram message when any of these files something material.

The whole bag, watched in one place: dilution, going concern, delisting notices, insider dumps. No account, no email. Every line cites its SEC source. /unwatch to stop.

WATCH THE WHOLE BAG ON TELEGRAM →

RANKED BY RISK INDEX, WORST FIRST. EVERY ROW LINKS TO THE FULL CITED REPORT.

?

How The Ranking Works

INPUT

Your tickers

Any US-listed names. The obscure ones are exactly why this exists.

SCAN

Same engine as every report

Red-flag scans, share-count history, cash burn, insider Form 4s: all from official filings.

RANK

Worst on top

The 0-100 risk index decides the order, so you know where to look first.